Jail the Bankers ?
Genealogy (Family History
The Great Re-Balancing 2007-?

GENERAL JOURNAL

My occasional longer publications on everything of interest to me. For my more frequent utterances in 140-character bursts, join me on Twitter.

Most Popular Recent Post: In Praise of Name-calling

Entries in Family etc (4)

Friday
May162014

Martha Jemimah Rafferty O'Rourke

This lady was one of my great-grandmothers. I am told by my cousin Judith that the hairstyle, clothing and accoutrements suggest that the photograph was taken in about 1905.

She seems to have been born in 1856. She claimed to have been born in Dublin, but I doubt it. Official registration of births began only in 1866. Nearly every child was baptised, though, and fairly full baptism records survive for 19th century Dublin. She is absent from those, as is her older sister, Mary Anne Josephine.

On her marriage certificate in August 1877, she is described merely as "full age".

This was not unusual. It means that she was 21 or older, and implies that she was born before August 1856.

On April 1 1901, she signed the household census forms declaring that she was born in Dublin and was aged 44, which is consistent with her marriage certificate, and implies a date of birth between April and July 1856. (Ten years later, at the 1911 Census, she declared that she was 52 ! This understatement of age was not uncommon, especially among females.)

Her father was James Rafferty. On the marriage certificate, his occupation is given as "commercial clerk", the same as that of the groom. This suggests that he may also, like the groom, have been an accountant. I have so far been unable to find anything whatsoever about him. The surname originates in Louth/South Armagh, but there were a few in Dublin by 1850.

Her mother was also Martha (I have no clue yet as to her mother's maiden name; she is of course also an ancestor, so I want to know it.) Martha (senior) seems to have lived (per Thom's Directory) at 34 Richmond Place (North) Dublin for a few years until 1877. In 1876, one F P O'Rourke became a lodger. There had been a previous lodger by the name of Tobin. (Most households in that era had lodgers). Was Martha junior still living there then ? I have no evidence confirming it, but one would have to suspect so.

Richmond Place is an address which no longer exists in the location. It is that part of North Circular Road from St Margaret's Avenue to Summerhill, just before it becomes Portland Row.

We can only speculate why FPO'R, then only 24, took lodgings on the north-eastern side of the city when his parents and sisters were living in Harolds Cross, on the south-western side, but several likely explanations are obvious.

Anyway, Mary Anne Rafferty married Horace W. Snow in January 1876 at Dublin's (RC) Pro-Cathedral. Snow was a Londoner, and I think that the poor man got a "3-fer": not just Mary Anne, but, possibly after an interval of about a year, her mother and sister, went back to London with him.

How Snow got involved with Ms Rafferty is an interesting question, but to answer it, I have as yet no clue. Did FPO'R & HWS meet first, perhaps as accountancy trainees in London ? Or perhaps Snow, like FPO'R, was involved in political activities. Maybe one or both Rafferty sisters were employed at the Palace of Westminster.

In any event, from some time in 1876 (per Thom's Directory) FPOR seems to have used Richmond Place as a combined home & office, and in August 1877 re-installed Martha Jemimah, having married her in London (St Mary's Chapel, Pancras), with Horace Snow as his best man. As you can see, the marriage certificate says that the bride was living at 17 Lady Margaret Road, Kentish Town, which is in the same general area as all of the addresses that the Snows had in the 1880s and 1890s. (Unfortunately, the information on addresses was not available in 1877).

Her first two children, Anne and Horace, were born at Richmond Place. Frank, Alphonsus and Aubrey were born at St Mary's Villas, Drumcondra Road. Catherine and Eileen were born at 34 43 Lower Drumcondra Road. I haven't yet established whether the latter two addresses were in fact the same house. [UPDATE: I have so established.} The family later moved to Clontarf.

Then comes the death/disappearance of my great-grandfather. He is reported in "Freemans Journal" as chairing a political meeting in October 1890, and several times earlier that year in similar activities as well. The Parnell Split occurs in the following month. FPOR is never mentioned in the press again until Martha dies, 35 years later - with the exception of a notice in the London Gazette placed by Horace Snow in May 1892. The notice recorded HWS's application to administer the estate on behalf of Martha, with FPO'R stated to have died at New York on 19 January 1892. I cannot verify either date or place of death.

Whatever happened, Martha had to live the rest of her life as a widowed mother of seven.

It must have been very hard, but you couldn't say that the results were unimpressive: two architects, an accountant, and a quantity surveyor is what the boys became. Anne married Coughlan Briscoe, a very interesting character, about whom I hope to educate you in due course. I know less about Patrick Sherlock, whom Eileen married, but the National Gallery received a bequest from him, which is suggestive of substance.

I know nothing of what happened to Catherine, the second-youngest child, except that she died in childhood, and before 1901.

Martha died in March 1927. All but one of her ten grandchildren had been born by then. I will not identify them here, but they included my father and his two brothers, a Briscoe, and women who married into the Barden, Tonge, Moore, Cleary and Royston families.

I think that Martha is the old lady pictured here not long before her death with my father and others.

Prior to her death, Eileen, still single, lived with her (I suspect strongly that she is the young-ish woman - not the girl - beside Martha in the above photograph). She probably got to keep all of her mother's stuff, such as it may have been. In any event, I can trace no application for probate or to administer her estate. There's nothing sinister about that.

Unfortunately, even though she was my father's godmother, Eileen's fate is unknown. She married in 1930, was widowed in 1940, and the last reference to her gives an address in London.

"The Irish Times" obituary for MJRO'R is here.

It is remarkable for its lack of any reference to her origins, or to her surviving sister, Mary Anne Snow.The statements about the circumstances of my great-grandfather's demise are not implausible but neither I nor anyone else has yet been able to verify them.

Tuesday
Jul302013

Genealogy

On my O'Rourke side, I am also descended from Fergusons, Raffertys, Hefferons, McFarlands and Murrays.

My mother was born Dwyer. On her side, my ancestors include Walkers, Kickhams, Tobins, Flynns, Egans, Carrigans, Graces, and Costellos.

I married a McSwiney.

Other families to whom I am connected less directly include:

AdamsDolan Jacus Miller Rutter
Armstrong Donnelly Jobin Minihane Ryan
Bacus Dowling Jones* Moloney Sample
BardenDowningKeeffe MolloyScott
BardoeDoyle* Kendrick MooreSeaman
BartonDugganKennedyMoranShanley
BerginEgan* KennyMullallySherlock
BlennerhassettEllardKing* Murphy* Skinner
Braun ElliotKirbyNewlandsSmith
Brady FahyLandyNeySnow
BriscoeFarlow LarkinO'BrienSpinola
BucknallFisher LavelleO'ConnorStarling
BushkovskiiFitzpatrick LeonardO'DonovanSwaine
Byrne* Fleck LikelyO DubháinTempleton
CaffreyFoxLockhartO'HanlonThomas
Carroll* Gaffney Londei O'Keeffe Thornley
CashelGarnLuceyOldisThurston
CasselberryGatfordLynchOlginTonge
ClancyGieysztorLyonsO'MahoneyTreacy
ClappertonGogginMcCarthyO'Mara Tunney
Cleary*GrahamMcGuinness O'ReillyTurpin
CoffeyGriffinMcKiernan Parry Twomey
CormicanGuttridgeMcNeilPayne Urquhart
Corswarem Hammond Madill Pearson Vetter
Coyle Hardcastle Maher Phelan Whelan
Cruess-Callaghan Hill Mandeville Randall White
Dalton Horan Mansfield Renaud Wood
De Courcey Hodson Martin Rogers Woodlock
Delehanty Hughes Mathers Roozrok Youseman
Dobbyn Humphries Meyler Royston


Those connections to other family names span 300 years, and the number of them - 160 or so (there will be occasional additions and removals as my knowledge improves) is mind-boggling at first sight. However, it is not so much so on reflection, and I suspect that the number of these connections is about average, for Irish people of my vintage anyway. (Family sizes are shrinking fast).

A Genealogy section will shortly be added to this website, and I will be sharing some stories from my research as ordinary blog-posts as well. I promise you that some of them (at least) will be interesting.


*More than one branch

Sunday
May012011

On Emigration #1

In Ireland, "emigration" is pretty universally regarded as A Bad Thing. (Attitudes to immigration are more ambivalent).

This attitude is generally explained in terms of the 19th century experience. Following the catastrophic "Great Famine" in the mid-1840s, during which a million died - the pre-Famine population was about 8 million - millions left the country. At its lowest point, the island's inhabitants numbered about 4 million, and the population remains below 6 million.

To put some context on this, the population of the neighbouring island of Great Britain increased from 19 million to nearly 60 million over the same period, despite wars and not insignificant emigration of its own to "the Colonies"(yes - net immigration played a part too). Europe, despite The Holocaust and similar horrors, also trebled in population.

For me, someone who has lived in Ireland for over half a century, and thought that he was historically aware, just recalling these bare facts has taken me considerably aback. It is probably fair to say that for anyone attempting to understand the Irish, ignoring the Famine is as crass as ignoring the Holocaust when considering the Israelis.

Behind the Irish statistics lie a multitude of family separations, destruction of communities, economic stagnation and, generally, a "world of hurt".

Insofar as there is a collectively shared narrative of what emigration means, it is still stuck in that historical recollection.

I trust that it is clear that I have considerable sympathy for that on a sentimental level. However, although there is still some reality in it, I dissent from the national consensus which accepts it as a rational approach to the present. I will be elaborating here on this view of mine over the next while.

Wednesday
Oct272010

1918 and all that

It's November, and the lapel poppies are coming out again. I will not be wearing one.

A grand-uncle of mine died as a British soldier in Iraq a little more than 90 years ago. At least one other relative also served. As far as I know, no-one related to me died - or even fought - in the Easter Rising of 1916 which was the beginning of the end for British rule in most of Ireland. (Another grand-uncle was, however, assassinated in the Civil War of 1922-3; he was a non-combatant politician).

Despite that, I consider that the state of which I am a citizen rightly honours the rebels of 1916, while I am not too happy with the current fashion to simultaneously honour those thousands of Irishmen like my relative who died fighting in the First World War. Mind you, there was overlap: some heroes of the War of Independence (1919-21) were veterans of WW1, General Tom Barry being a celebrated example.

It is not that I am ashamed of my relative. Not at all. I have no idea why he joined the British Army, but no great feats of imagination are required to understand it. Irish men of all backgrounds did so, for all the reasons that young men still join armies. In the Ireland of 1914, there were also political reasons being added to the normal mixture of motives: the leaders of the Irish Party presented enlistment as a duty to the cause of Irish self-government.

Closer to the present day, two first cousins of mine have served in the British Army. They are not pariahs but very popular members at our family gatherings.

This sort of experience is not unique to my family; it is probably replicated, to some degree, in almost every Irish family.

The young men of 1914-18 are all dead now. Those who died "for Ireland" in 1916 or 1919-21 were not necessarily more heroic than those who died fighting for the British Empire's fatal miscalculation.

The point is that the deaths of the former were in a cause that I value: Ireland's entitlement to self-determination. This is also a cause that it makes sense for the State to honour; what sense does it make for the State to honour the sacrifices for the British Empire ?

To "honour" the Irish regiments in WW1 is to endorse by implication the cause for which they fought. In the service of what cause did my relative die ? Irish soldiers in The Great War were at least partially driven by a belief that it was their patriotic or religious duty (British propaganda portraying the German invaders of Belgium as anti-Catholic barbarians was very effective).

Nationalist opinion as the war progressed became sceptical and, helped by the Tory coup d'etat, the 1916 Rising and the threat of conscription in early 1918, became steadily more disaffected from the British state.

What was Britain's purpose in WW1? That is a question routinely evaded, but whatever it was, it did not include granting self-determination to Ireland. We had been duped. (Two decades later, it was entirely understandable that we should have been resistant to a reprise of the dupe rôle.)

Why should we "honour" as a body of men those who were duped ? Remember, yes, but let us recall them as individuals, some of them as fine as one could imagine and many who were better people than those proved right by events.