Jail the Bankers ?
Genealogy (Family History
The Great Re-Balancing 2007-?

GENERAL JOURNAL

My occasional longer publications on everything of interest to me. For my more frequent utterances in 140-character bursts, join me on Twitter.

Most Popular Recent Post: In Praise of Name-calling

Entries in Ireland-History (6)

Tuesday
Jul302013

Genealogy

On my O'Rourke side, I am also descended from Fergusons, Raffertys, Hefferons, McFarlands and Murrays.

My mother was born Dwyer. On her side, my ancestors include Walkers, Kickhams, Tobins, Flynns, Egans, Carrigans, Graces, and Costellos.

I married a McSwiney.

Other families to whom I am connected less directly include:

AdamsDolan Jacus Miller Rutter
Armstrong Donnelly Jobin Minihane Ryan
Bacus Dowling Jones* Moloney Sample
BardenDowningKeeffe MolloyScott
BardoeDoyle* Kendrick MooreSeaman
BartonDugganKennedyMoranShanley
BerginEgan* KennyMullallySherlock
BlennerhassettEllardKing* Murphy* Skinner
Braun ElliotKirbyNewlandsSmith
Brady FahyLandyNeySnow
BriscoeFarlow LarkinO'BrienSpinola
BucknallFisher LavelleO'ConnorStarling
BushkovskiiFitzpatrick LeonardO'DonovanSwaine
Byrne* Fleck LikelyO DubháinTempleton
CaffreyFoxLockhartO'HanlonThomas
Carroll* Gaffney Londei O'Keeffe Thornley
CashelGarnLuceyOldisThurston
CasselberryGatfordLynchOlginTonge
ClancyGieysztorLyonsO'MahoneyTreacy
ClappertonGogginMcCarthyO'Mara Tunney
Cleary*GrahamMcGuinness O'ReillyTurpin
CoffeyGriffinMcKiernan Parry Twomey
CormicanGuttridgeMcNeilPayne Urquhart
Corswarem Hammond Madill Pearson Vetter
Coyle Hardcastle Maher Phelan Whelan
Cruess-Callaghan Hill Mandeville Randall White
Dalton Horan Mansfield Renaud Wood
De Courcey Hodson Martin Rogers Woodlock
Delehanty Hughes Mathers Roozrok Youseman
Dobbyn Humphries Meyler Royston


Those connections to other family names span 300 years, and the number of them - 160 or so (there will be occasional additions and removals as my knowledge improves) is mind-boggling at first sight. However, it is not so much so on reflection, and I suspect that the number of these connections is about average, for Irish people of my vintage anyway. (Family sizes are shrinking fast).

A Genealogy section will shortly be added to this website, and I will be sharing some stories from my research as ordinary blog-posts as well. I promise you that some of them (at least) will be interesting.


*More than one branch

Sunday
Jun052011

Emigration #4

The previous blogposts in this series have now been kindly re-published as a single article here by TheJournal.ie.

The article has generated a satisfying number of comments, some of quality, and there has also been vigorous reaction on Twitter.

The discussion will continue here and elsewhere.

Monday
May022011

Emigration #2

My view on emigration is, understandably, shaped by my experience.

I was born in Canada, as was my eldest brother (we have joint citizenship).Of the nine children produced by my four grandparents, not one spent their entire working life in the State, and three are permanently resident abroad.Of my seven siblings, only one has not lived and worked abroad, and two still do.

I have 34 first cousins living, of whom 25 were born in Ireland. Nineteen now live in Ireland, of whom three have returned after being located elsewhere.

I have three children. One lives in Dublin (at least three hours travelling time away). The other two live abroad.

I have nine nephews/nieces: four live abroad.

To sum all this up: Emigration has always been part of the story of my family as I have known it.

It's not exactly that "it's no big deal", as it were; it is more a case that this is Life - if your desires, plans, ambitions, relationships need you to live a long way away from where you grew up, you do it. You do not wring your hands, and wish that it could be otherwise, and neither do those whom you are leaving behind. There is some pain in separation, but it's not "the end of the world."

Of course, it is very important to this mind-set that separation, albeit it may be prolonged over years, is not seen as permanent. For many Irish families, though not mine, the experience of emigration meant the departure of family members who were never seen or heard from again.

Next, I hope to address the topic of emigration in the context of Ireland's current circumstances in 2011.

Sunday
May012011

On Emigration #1

In Ireland, "emigration" is pretty universally regarded as A Bad Thing. (Attitudes to immigration are more ambivalent).

This attitude is generally explained in terms of the 19th century experience. Following the catastrophic "Great Famine" in the mid-1840s, during which a million died - the pre-Famine population was about 8 million - millions left the country. At its lowest point, the island's inhabitants numbered about 4 million, and the population remains below 6 million.

To put some context on this, the population of the neighbouring island of Great Britain increased from 19 million to nearly 60 million over the same period, despite wars and not insignificant emigration of its own to "the Colonies"(yes - net immigration played a part too). Europe, despite The Holocaust and similar horrors, also trebled in population.

For me, someone who has lived in Ireland for over half a century, and thought that he was historically aware, just recalling these bare facts has taken me considerably aback. It is probably fair to say that for anyone attempting to understand the Irish, ignoring the Famine is as crass as ignoring the Holocaust when considering the Israelis.

Behind the Irish statistics lie a multitude of family separations, destruction of communities, economic stagnation and, generally, a "world of hurt".

Insofar as there is a collectively shared narrative of what emigration means, it is still stuck in that historical recollection.

I trust that it is clear that I have considerable sympathy for that on a sentimental level. However, although there is still some reality in it, I dissent from the national consensus which accepts it as a rational approach to the present. I will be elaborating here on this view of mine over the next while.

Wednesday
Apr272011

Er, That "Nonsense" About 800 Years...

...may not be so nonsensical after all*.

Via "The Browser", I learn of an amazing historical study entitled "Persecution Perpetuated: Medieval Origins of Anti-Semitic Violence in Nazi Germany" by Nico Voigtländer and Hans-Joachim Voth (Economists are everywhere).

The abstract reads (paragraphing and emphasis added by me):

How persistent are cultural traits ?

This paper uses data on anti-Semitism in Germany and finds continuity at the local level over more than half a millennium. When the Black Death hit Europe in 1348-50, killing between one third and one half of the population, its cause was unknown. Many contemporaries blamed the Jews. Cities all over Germany witnessed mass killings of their Jewish population. At the same time, numerous Jewish communities were spared these horrors.

We use plague pogroms as an indicator for medieval anti-Semitism. Pogroms during the Black Death are a strong and robust predictor of violence against Jews in the 1920s, and of votes for the Nazi Party.

In addition, cities that saw medieval anti-Semitic violence also had higher deportation rates for Jews after 1933, were more likely to see synagogues damaged or destroyed in the Night of Broken Glass in 1938, and their inhabitants wrote more anti-Jewish letters to the editor of the Nazi newspaper Der Stürmer.

Wow !

*The reference will need no explanation for most Irish, but I have a few readers who are not so blessed. Next Sunday, it will in fact be 842 years since The Invasion led by Richard de Clare - better known as "Strongbow" - began our history as the Most Oppressed People Ever ("MOPE"). Allegedly.

Wednesday
Oct272010

1918 and all that

It's November, and the lapel poppies are coming out again. I will not be wearing one.

A grand-uncle of mine died as a British soldier in Iraq a little more than 90 years ago. At least one other relative also served. As far as I know, no-one related to me died - or even fought - in the Easter Rising of 1916 which was the beginning of the end for British rule in most of Ireland. (Another grand-uncle was, however, assassinated in the Civil War of 1922-3; he was a non-combatant politician).

Despite that, I consider that the state of which I am a citizen rightly honours the rebels of 1916, while I am not too happy with the current fashion to simultaneously honour those thousands of Irishmen like my relative who died fighting in the First World War. Mind you, there was overlap: some heroes of the War of Independence (1919-21) were veterans of WW1, General Tom Barry being a celebrated example.

It is not that I am ashamed of my relative. Not at all. I have no idea why he joined the British Army, but no great feats of imagination are required to understand it. Irish men of all backgrounds did so, for all the reasons that young men still join armies. In the Ireland of 1914, there were also political reasons being added to the normal mixture of motives: the leaders of the Irish Party presented enlistment as a duty to the cause of Irish self-government.

Closer to the present day, two first cousins of mine have served in the British Army. They are not pariahs but very popular members at our family gatherings.

This sort of experience is not unique to my family; it is probably replicated, to some degree, in almost every Irish family.

The young men of 1914-18 are all dead now. Those who died "for Ireland" in 1916 or 1919-21 were not necessarily more heroic than those who died fighting for the British Empire's fatal miscalculation.

The point is that the deaths of the former were in a cause that I value: Ireland's entitlement to self-determination. This is also a cause that it makes sense for the State to honour; what sense does it make for the State to honour the sacrifices for the British Empire ?

To "honour" the Irish regiments in WW1 is to endorse by implication the cause for which they fought. In the service of what cause did my relative die ? Irish soldiers in The Great War were at least partially driven by a belief that it was their patriotic or religious duty (British propaganda portraying the German invaders of Belgium as anti-Catholic barbarians was very effective).

Nationalist opinion as the war progressed became sceptical and, helped by the Tory coup d'etat, the 1916 Rising and the threat of conscription in early 1918, became steadily more disaffected from the British state.

What was Britain's purpose in WW1? That is a question routinely evaded, but whatever it was, it did not include granting self-determination to Ireland. We had been duped. (Two decades later, it was entirely understandable that we should have been resistant to a reprise of the dupe rôle.)

Why should we "honour" as a body of men those who were duped ? Remember, yes, but let us recall them as individuals, some of them as fine as one could imagine and many who were better people than those proved right by events.